The Vanity and Insanity of Humanity By: Gen. Jim
How far will this wokeness go?
That is, how far will the U.S. government go along with all this DEI (diversity – equity – inclusion) bull sh*t? Telling us that men can get pregnant, have periods, breastfeed (that is if they allow a child to be BORN rather than be MURDERED, aka aborted). How far will they go with all this pronoun BS, all these (supposed) genders which are now up past 475 genders and counting?
It wasn’t too long ago when the LGBTQ community was fighting for same-sex unions, which soon turned into the fight for same-sex marriage. Back in those days, we were living in Sacramento, California, putting forth Biblical condemnation, against all this gender/sex/abomination stuff.
Boy O boy did we catch hell! What kicked off a protracted nasty war against ACMTC (and we, the generals) was when we brought onto our radio program (called “Battle Cry”) an ex-homosexual (John S.) who proceeded to tell our audience that the CA government was full of homosexuals and lesbians. This testimony spread throughout California and then across the nation.
The HATE campaign was underway. The rest is in history if you look up our names and the name ACMTC.
We, back then (very early 1980s) told the people that the time was coming that same-sex unions would become same-sex marriages, that transgenderism would be promoted, (WON in court) and that pedophilia would win in court (lowering age of victims) and having sex with beasts would become common (yet more hidden).
[Note: I understand the V.P. K. Harris (who is running for POTUS, after she helped in a coup to oust sleepy Joe Biden!) picked Tim Walz (called “Tampon Tim” by many) who is said to have had sex with horses – yuk!!!].
I’ve written numerous articles on all these subjects over the years. What I wrote back in the late 1970’s/early 1980’s is now law! I well remember all the pros and cons of the same-sex marriage debates.
“We deal with a right to privacy older than the Bill of Rights – older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty not commercial or social project. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions…”
— From Justice Douglas’s ruling for majority, U.S. Supreme Court, Griswald V. Connecticut, June 1965.
[I had just finished my Army basic/months of further training in June 1965]. In those days if one was caught in sodomy, a section 8 was quickly handed down to the guilty. OUT of the Army! Marriage was for two persons: a male/man and a female/woman. Period! (See Genesis 1:26-28/2:22-24). “Man” (“ish”) and “woman” (“ishah”).
Sex in the very beginning was not regarded as evil or dirty but as good; it was between man and a woman. Homosexuality (male) and lesbianism (female) was out of the question. Transgenderism was not even thought of by God, neither was sex with animals or pedophilia. These abominations came later as the result of man’s/woman’s fall in the Garden of Paradise, and written against in the Holiness Code (Leviticus 18/Romans 1 et al).
Leviticus 18 is still in effect; it is a universal HC against the forbidden sexual relations – which was/is condemned by the Creator God. Leviticus 18:6-18 is an old list of 12 sexual prohibitions (compare the 12 “curses” in Deuteronomy 27). Even “child sacrifice” was condemned (Leviticus 18:21), a precursor to abortion – the MURDER of the unborn to the god of “sexual freedom.” This abomination was committed at the past DNC held August of this year.
It is reported that an abortion truck was on ground to PUT to DEATH the unborn, aka “unwanted.” This is the democratic party, aka demoncratic party!
Back to same-sex marriage: The “Defense of Marriage Act” of 1996 revealed how politically dangerous it was for most politicians to endorse anything as contentious an issue or s-sm. Back then many majorities remained opposed to legalization. Thank God. It was (and still is) a matter of morals. Morals and religion are still enemies to the woke BS today.
Democratic liberalism/demoncratic wokeness are not in agreement all the time. There are some “sane” dems in the DP but more and more the DP is moving to the far “Left” (Harris and Walz). These two are EXTREME, so much so they are of the communist camp (see my articles on “C”).
S-S marriage is not new. Oh, no, it has been around for ages. “Same-sex love, as Pluto’s symposium shows, is as ancient as human love, and the question of how it is recognized and understood has bedeviled every human civilization,” one historian wrote. (See my “Gay Way” series in which I put forth lots of ancient author’s writings on sex, especially when I critique John Boswell’s writings on homosexuality, famous for his research of past pro-homo authors etc.).
I believe Matthew 24:38 could be speaking of s-s marriage: “For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, MARRYING and giving in MARRIAGE, until the day Noah entered the ark, and they knew nothing until the flood came and swept them ALL away…”
Stop and think about this verse. Why would God destroy ALL human life (except Noah and his family) if they were not entirely PERVERTED, could Matthew 24:38 be speaking of same-sex marriages – men/men, women/women? Would God destroy those who were just getting married – man/woman? If we’re to believe that God’s anger was kindled over mere rapine, luxury, and riot, and not abominable sex, we might want to reconcile this. Marrying was as old as time.
But why mention it in connection with the destroying flood? And “eating and drinking?” What was sinful about this? Humans need food and drink. Could Jesus had in mind (I believe) “eating and drinking” to idols (which idolatry was also an abomination). Do your research on sex-sins/idolatry = all connected.
Reading Genesis chapter 6 (v.1-18) we see how God felt about the pre-flood people. Genesis 6:1-4 we read about the Nephilims, some versions have “giants.” Genesis 6 speaks of sex between the sons of God and the daughters of men.
The Nephilims, a mythical race of giants mentioned in Numbers 13:33, represented as semi-divine, the offspring of the sons of God and the daughters of men. The beliefs that among the early peoples of the earth were giants and that marriages of the “gods” with mortals frequently occurred are found in other ancient writings (see Skinner, Genesis p.140, for refs.).
Besides Numbers 13:33, there is Joshua 15:14; Deuteronomy 1:28; 2:10, 11, 21; 9:2; and Amos 2:9. Besides sodomy, the marriages of divine/human beings was infamous and demanded punishment. Idolatry, adultery and sodomy were grave sins, which accumulated in the human wickedness before and after the flood. Genesis 10:19 first mentions the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah – just 4 chapters after the Noah event.
Back to Genesis 6 where the word giants or Nephilim is mentioned (v.4). Nephilim (Hebrew nephil) derives from a root meaning “to fall” and is translated as “fallen ones”. It refers to the Fallen Angels, the offspring of these beings called “Sons of God”.
There are three views on Genesis 6:1-4:
- The Sons of God are the line of Seth and the daughters of men are the line of Cain.
- The Sons of God refer to the angels who fell from Heaven, and the daughters of men are human women.
- The Sons of God could refer to the Judeo-Christian priesthood, who are in line to Seth, thus producing a “new line.”
Whichever theory one follows, one thing is clear: those days were also full of sin and many relationships were ungodly (and so perverse). In fact, this ungodliness can lead to a form of demon possession, as we see in Matthew 8:28, Mark 5:2, Luke 8:27.
To this day, men and women who have had relationships with the opposite sex, for fornication or adultery are frequently caught up with demons! (Also see the fallen angels/demons as described in Ephesians 6:12).
The anger of God is made clear in Genesis 6:5-7 where He states, “The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time.”
Do you suppose there is something to “every inclination?” Oh yes! Just read some of the awful sexual acts in the Old Testament (which reflects on some sexual acts performed today, with the same spirit of Sodom).
In Genesis 18, God tells Abraham that He was going to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah because their “wickedness” was so great (v.20). Abraham pleads for their safety, yet still, we see the judgment of God comes when two angels appear to the city and are seen by Lot (v.1).
Men, in their desperation to have sex with the angels, went so far as to demand Lot turn them over to them (v.5). The abominable sins of sodomy resulted in judgment for the city (v.24). The fire and brimstone fell and destroyed all of the wickedness (v.24). In fact, we see Lot’s wife turns back (v.26), which results in her death as she became a pillar of salt.
Concluding Notes
The above text reflects profound insights and historical references regarding the ongoing societal shifts in understanding marriage, gender, and morality.
In the light of current debates, it's essential to approach these topics with sensitivity, respect, and a well-rounded understanding of their implications on personal beliefs and societal norms.
